I rarely see movies in the theater of late. There are many reasons for this, but most of them involve what I will call, without elaborating "ROI". Basically, the movies themselves are not worth the $12 USD ticket price and the relative inconvenience over other alternatives.I am a die-hard cinema fanatic and, in some ways, miss the theater--a focused experience with no home distractions, the power and quality of 35 and 70mm projection, broadly-ambient 6-track surround sound, and now digital projection of stunning clarity. There is still nothing like watching a great movie on a big screen. However, there are few films that, to me, warrant the outing.
A brilliant exception... The Christopher Nolan blockbuster "Batman: The Dark Knight", (now in theaters and with the biggest opening weekend ticket-purchase-wise in the history of film)... and seeing it in the IMAX experience. With all of my love of "highbrow" art films, international cinema, etc., I confess that this big-budget epic would, ordinarily, not be as much my proverbial cup of tea as one might think. There is, though, my passion for Sci Fi, and for great Action epics -- some of which rival(ed) (or even emulate(d)) the works of Ford, Kurosawa, et. al. -- and I get tremendous pleasure when one is truly wonderful. The Dark Knight? TRULY WONDERFUL!
What makes this film not just an extraordinary thrill to behold in an enormous IMAX (and, I'm sure, in a HD Digital-projected) environment, and a hold-your-breath special effects action adventure with a terrific series of locations (New York/Chicago-hybrid Gotham City, Hong Kong, etc.), which is a well-directed thriller and is generally well-acted by the always fine Christian Bale, Gary Oldman, Morgan Freeman, the great Sir Michael Caine (less utilized in this chapter of the Batman series, so Freeman, one of my long-time favorites since the children's TV series, "The Electric Company", many centuries ago when I was a kid, surpasses him), the surprising Aaron Eckart (in that order) and a decent, though un-special, Maggie Gyllenhaal (a curious bit of casting to replace the awful Katie Holmes as Rachel Dawes... we miss you, Katie--who can we laugh at in this film)? Two words (and not just from the "hype")... HEATH LEDGER. The late actor's Joker is IMHO, as someone also put it, the "finest screen villain since Hannibal Lecter." No exaggeration.
I won't give away too much, but Ledger's performance is, again IMHO, incomparable. His treatment of all of the "bravura" parts is, as many expected with all the buildup, technically brilliant. However, it is the subtlety of his performance -- just the constant licking of the lips alone, used not only as an effect but going even a layer below to the physiological (he is compensating for his deformity) -- and the fact that he then acts a character as a layer above everything, makes it beyond compare. This, for example, is what was missing for me in Jamie Foxx's hardworking portrayal of Ray Charles in "Ray". I felt that one marvelled at Foxx's technical performance but there was no "additional acting" which made you realize that a characterization was in play. The last performance of that type that I saw on film was Martin Landau's Oscar®-winning portrayal of Bela Lugosi in the so-so, tongue-in-cheek Tim Burton biopic, "Ed Wood". Landau elevated an otherwise enjoyable but ordinary film to a great one through the strength of his, and his alone, once-in-a-lifetime essay of Lugosi--a human being, as well as an icon, in a struggle with depression and drug addiction. Ledger gives this level of performance in "The Dark Knight"; a far better film overall than "Ed Wood" (ironically, Burton directed the first films in the late '8os/'90s Batman series), but brought to true classic status through Ledger's work.
It is painful to know that Ledger -- who captivated me as an acting presence since his performance as Billy Bob Thornton's son, Sonny, in the excellent "Monster's Ball" -- no longer walks the Earth. I hope, wherever his spirit is, he is smiling from ear-to-ear at his achievement as the Joker. Hahahahahahahahaha!!!
Here is the trailer, from YouTube:
5 comments:
Very nice article! I think the script is the 2nd best of the movie. Heath and writers should be nominated for this year's film awards.--V
Darling, what a well written review. Ricardo and I will find some time to go and see on the big screen. We should collaborate soon.
Love,
pp
Thanks for the review :)
The Batman. In general, Batman was always a "dark" comic, unlike the "brighter" Superman. When Batman first appeared in print in "Detectives Comics" in 1939, he used violence and the threat of violence to either obtain information from or apprehend the villains. He even used a gun on several occasions and, at least once, shot and killed one of his adversaries in 1940. Bruce Wayne, Batman's alter-ego,was a brooding loner. Batman's chief adversaries were mentally deranged murderers.
The Joker. The Joker was originally a psychopathic killer who committed crimes just for the sake of chaos. Not to become rich. Not to rule the world. But just for the sake of mayhem, murder, madness and destruction. His character was so over the top that it was used as one of the justifications, along with the "zombie gore" horror-type comics, for instituting the "Comics Code" in the 1950s. There was a movement to make comics more "suitable" for children. It all culminated in the campy portrayal of Batman in the CBS television series in the 1960s. But, during the 1970s, realism began to creep back into comics, spearheaded by the super powered but humanly flawed heroes at Marvel Comics (Spiderman, The Hulk, The X-men, The Daredevil, Iron Man, etc.). Then, Frank Miller, one of the greatest comic writers of the modern era, wrote a Batman series called "The Dark Knight". It took Batman back to his dark, dangerous, unlikeable roots. Bruce Wayne once again became a brooding loner obsessed with fighting crime, even at the expense of the very laws he believed he was upholding. The Joker was returned to his psychopathic, nihilistic origins. In order to get a good feel for the world of the Batman and the Joker, please read "The Killing Joke" and "Arkham Asylum" graphic novels.
I hear that the movie "The Dark Knight" captures the Batman's world expertly. My son went to see it on Saturday and has been raving about it since. And, now that Karlisimo has chimed in, I know it to be the truth.
Hassan.
As always, your writing enthralls and captures the mood of your subject. I saw "The Dark Knight" on opening day, and I was completely taken with Heath Ledger's performance. At the same time, the Joker scared me, amazed me, and made me marvel at his genius! I can't wait to see what the Academy has to say about his performance! Thank you for your terrific review, Karl.
Post a Comment